World Affairs

PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BY COMMENTING
Leave Comment Message Writer
Hire Writer
Report Article

Track Writer

Add to Favorites

by Brother Carlton

10/09/15
Free to Share
Author requests article critique

It is difficult if not impossible to get the truth about the current Middle East crisis from mainstream U. S. news whether by TV, newspapers or magazines.

Why is this? You have to understand who owns the major news networks including The Associated Press news wires (AP) and Reuters, Time magazine, Newsweek, CNN, Fox News.

These are ALL Zionist controlled by billionaires with an agenda to push for a New World Order One World Government.

Because of this important fact you will need to seek out alternative sources of legitimate news by trustworthy sources.

The following, I believe, will help you understand some things you may not be getting on your TV, newspaper and magazine news.j

Where you find the word NOTE in bold letters is R. E.'s personal thoughts and/or comments.

The following was sent to me by an economist acquaintance of mine who writes a newsletter. His name is R. E. McMaster and he follows commodities, weather cycles, world events. He is very well connected to his own personal intelligence network and he had the difficult task of flying fighter jets for the Air Force during the Vietname War. He has consulted with leaders from around the world so he knows a few things about current events and the state of our political and economic health.

"The globalist leaders in the US and at NATO continued their desperate attempts this week to paint Russia’s involvement in Syria as some kind of evil. They tried to make the case that 90% of Russia’s attacks are on US supported 'moderate rebels' (false: it is about 50%), as if there was some quantifiable difference between the US-backed rebels and the US-created ISIS. Their first efforts to blame Russia for civilian casualties was exposed as an outright fraud since the pictures produced had existed before Russian jets had even taken off. But the worldwide outrage over the massive and inexcusable US attack on a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Afghanistan forced the US to temporarily abandon this supremely hypocritical line of attack

...The main US tactic is to create a nonstop barrage of criticism against the Russian presence and the Assad regime. The US has manufactured false claims for years about Assad’s use of chemical weapons and barrel bombs against his own people, which were simply not true. The US continues to decry the dangers of uncoordinated airstrikes in Syria by all the parties to the war but refuses any Russian offer to formally coordinate the strikes. That’s because coordination would involve discussions about the various targets and reveal US duplicity in not wanting to strike effective targets

...What the US is looking for is an excuse to put into effect a no-fly zone, which would stop only Russian and Syria aircraft. Hillary Clinton and various other Republican neocons have demanded that such a no-fly zone be put into effect, but the US knows that they can’t arbitrarily control the Russians with a one-sided edict. Russia has various anti-aircraft batteries in country and could effectively threaten a non-negotiated no fly zone imposition. Russia also has the higher ground in terms of international law. The US went into Syria without a specific UN mandate, but Russia is responding to a call for help by a UN member, which is sufficient justification under international law

...The world is tired of US hegemony and bullying, dictating the terms of selective regime change, protecting some tyrants and deposing others. The world is also tired of the US dominated war on terror, which has become a never ending war of attrition used to justify continued government intervention in people’s liberty to live, travel and do business. The original US plan to create a No Fly Zone invasion in Syria was foiled three years ago when Kerry unintentionally gave Syria an out when he off-handedly offered a chemical weapons agreement. So the US and British created ISIS to have an excuse to get back into Syria and at the same time establish a new terrorist bogeyman. But Putin saw this as an opportunity to jump into the war against ISIS and accomplish several things:
1) Embarrass the US/globalist agenda by showing what effective air strikes against ISIS can do; 2) Help ally Syria defy regime change by targeting US-backed rebels with air and ground strikes; 3) Garner international praise for standing up to US intervention. Ultimately this helps set Russia up as the world leader in 'taking down the bully of the world' as the US is now viewed

...The globalists are actually targeting Iran as the only Muslim country capable of becoming self-sufficient in the full range of indigenous weapons systems. All other Muslim and Arab countries are completely dependent on weapons from the West and because of that have long been 'cannon fodder' in global wars. As early as 2004, Israel was tasked by the globalists to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities with the promise that the US and NATO would intervene when Iran retaliated against US troops in the area. But Syria suddenly came into their cross-hairs when Israel demanded that Syria be taken out before they attacked Iran, since Syria’s huge arsenal of ballistic missiles was a much greater retaliatory threat than Iran’s, and closer too

...the sudden US eagerness to suggest a nuclear agreement with Iran was only a delaying tactic so that the US could concentrate on Syria first. The agreement is a huge trap for Iran, filled with dozens of ways in which Iran can be accused of cheating, combined with an automatic provision for UN approval of future military reprisals
...I and others have found it very strange that so far Israel hasn’t experienced one attack by ISIS. How could that be given that Israel is as hated as the US and is right next door? Of course, that would be more evidence that Israel is deeply involved in the creation and control of ISIS through its many Arab agents that pose as terrorist leaders." - Joel Skousen, World Affairs Brief, 10-09-15

NOTE: Syria, like Iran, has its own independent central bank, is not in debt to the Western Zionist-controlled central banking monopoly. Syria held over $5 billion in overseas currencies with no debt in their nation/economy before this trumped up war against Syria was initiated by the global elitists.

***

"The Empire has become extremely silly—so silly that I believe it deserves the title of the World's Silliest Empire. One could claim that it has been silly before, but recent developments seem to signal a quantum leap in its silliness level.

"The first bit of extreme silliness surfaced when Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, the head of the United States Central Command, told a Senate panel that only a very small number of Syrian fighters trained by the United States remained in the fight—perhaps as few as five. The tab for training and equipping them was $500 million. That's $100 million per fighter, but that's OK, because it's all good as long as the military contractors are getting paid. Things got even sillier when it later turned out that even these few fighters got car-jacked by ISIS/al Qaeda in Syria (whatever they are currently calling themselves) and got their vehicles and weapons taken away from them...

"The next silly moment arrived at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, where Obama, who went on for 30 minutes instead of the allotted 15 (does Mr. Silly President know how to read a clock?) managed to use up all of this time and say absolutely nothing that made any sense to anyone. But it was Putin's speech that laid out the Empire's silliness for all to see when he scolded the US for making a bloody mess of the Middle East with its ham-handed interventions. The oft-repeated quote is 'Do you understand what you have done?' but that's not quite right. The Russian «Вы хоть понимаете теперь, чего вы натворили?» can be more accurately translated as 'How can you even now fail to understand what a mess you have made?' Words matter: this is not how one talks to a superpower before an assembly of the world's leaders; this is how one scolds a stupid and wayward child. In the eyes of the whole world, this made the Empire look rather silly.

"What happened next is that Russia announced the start of its bombing campaign against all manner of terrorists in Syria (and perhaps Iraq too; the Iraqi request is in Putin's in-box). What's notable about this bombing campaign is that it is entirely legal. The legitimate, elected government of Syria asked Russia for help; the campaign was approved by the Russian legislature. On the other hand, the bombing campaign that the US has been conducting in Syria is entirely illegal

..When a Russian correspondent (Gayane Chichakyan from RT) asked the White House press secretary under what legal authority the US was bombing Syria, he at first pretended to not understand the question, then babbled incoherently, looking rather silly. You see, the US likes to fight wars (or rather, its military contractors like to fight wars, because that's how they make money, and they happen to own a big piece of the US government). But the US can't win any wars, and that makes its entire war effort rather silly (in a murderous sort of way) [at trillions upon trillions of dollars of US taxpayer expense for which US taxpayers get zero benefit and their civil rights confiscated]...

"But once you make a fool of yourself, why stop? Indeed, Obama shows no intention of stopping. Just about the entire audience at the UN General Assembly knew that the Syrian government's chemical attack on its own people never happened. The chemicals were provided by the Saudis and were unwittingly used by the Syrian rebels on themselves. Lying, when everybody knows that you are lying, and knows that you know that you are lying: what could possibly be sillier? Ok, how about continuously prattling on about 'freedom and democracy'—in the Middle East, after throwing the whole region into chaos through their brain-dead interventions? The only voice of reason in the US seems to be that of Donald Trump, who recently declared that the Middle East was more stable under Saddam Hussein, Moammar Khaddafi and Bashar al Assad. Indeed it was. [and no elitist Jewish Zionist inspired migrant/illegal alien invasion of Euroland, the UK, Scandinavia and the US] The fact that the only non-silly politician left in the US is Trump—that bloviating moneybag—sets a rather high bar for silliness for the country as a whole."Prattling on about 'freedom and democracy' in the Middle East is also silly because the entire region is tribal—has been tribal for a few thousand years, and will be tribal for a few thousand more. In each locale, some tribe is on top. If the idea is to carve it up into sovereign territorial units (none of which qualifies as a nation, because each one ends up being multinational) then each territorial unit ends up being ruled by some tribe while others grumble. Blunder in and exploit their grumbling to bring about 'regime change'—and the whole place invariably burns down.

"A case in point is Israel: it's got the top dog tribe—the Jews, and they can shoot or bomb anybody else with impunity. It is considered 'democratic' because the Jews get to vote, which is very nice for the Jews. The Alawites in Syria get to vote too—and vote for Bashar al Assad—so why isn't that good enough? Because of American hypocrisy and double standards.

"It's like that right down the line. Saudi Arabia is owned by one tribe—the House of Saud, and everybody else is disenfranchised. Iraq used to be run by the Sunnis from Saddam Hussein's tribe, but the Americans dislodged them, and now what remains of it is ruled by the Shia from the south of the country while the Sunnis ran off and joined ISIS. This can all seem like super-simple stuff, but not for the Americans, because it runs counter to their ideology, which dictates that the world must be remade in America's image. And so they keep trying to do this (or keep pretending to be trying, because results don't matter as long as their military contractors get paid) and don't seem to care one bit that this is making them look very silly.

"And so the typical pattern has been this: the US bombs a country to smithereens, mounts a ground invasion, sets up a puppet regime and, promptly or not so promptly, pulls out. The puppet regime falls apart, and then you have either ungovernable chaos or some new, especially nasty form of dictatorship, or a little of each: a failed state, like Libya, and Yemen, and much of Afghanistan [where the US presence has allowed opium production to rise to a record high], Iraq and Syria. It doesn't much matter that this is the result (as long as the military contractors are getting paid) because America's motto seems to be 'Look Silly and Carry On.' Wreck a country—and it's on to the next bombing campaign.

"But this is where it all gets meta-silly: in Syria they can't even achieve that. The Americans have been bombing ISIS for a year now; meanwhile, ISIS has gotten stronger and occupied more territory. But they haven't gotten around to overthrowing Assad; instead, the ISIS boys have been busy prancing around the desert in black head rags and white basketball shoes taking selfies, blowing up archaeological sites, enslaving women and beheading anyone they don't like.

"But now it appears that the Russians have achieved in five days of bombing what the Americans couldn't in a year and the ISIS boys are running away to Jordan; others want to go to Germany and ask for asylum. This has made the Americans upset, because, you see, the Russians were bombing 'their [CIA funded and equipped] terrorists—the ones the Americans recruited, armed and trained... and then bombed? I know, silly—but true. The Russians will have none of that, because their approach is, if it looks like a terrorist and quacks like a terrorist, then it is a terrorist, so let's bomb it. [The CIA has long been the clandestine enforcement arm of the international banksters.]

"But it is understandable that this approach is unpopular with the Americans: here they were carefully pumping the place full of weapons and equipment, and bombing carefully around the edges so as not to blow up any of it, and the Russians just blunder in and blow it all up! The Saudis are absolutely livid, because it was they who paid for much of it. Plus the terrorists are their own Wahhabi-Takfiri brethren—the ones who like to declare various other Muslims that they don't happen to like to be infidels, in direct violation of their own Sharia law. Does that remind you of anyone? Anyone silly?

"But it doesn't appear that the US can do anything to stop the Russians, or the Chinese who also want to get a piece of ISIS to stuff and mount, or the Iranians and the Hezbollah fighters who are ready to march in and mop up what remains of ISIS once the bombing missions destroy all the war materiel it has amassed. And so it's time for Americans to start an information war by accusing the Russians of causing civilian casualties.

"Of course, being Americans, they have to prosecute this information war in the silliest way possible. First, you trot out your claims of civilian casualties before the Russians fly a single sortie. Oops! Then you stuff the social media with fake pictures of wounded children produced beforehand by performers in white helmets paid for by George Soros. And then, when asked for evidence, you refuse to provide any.

"So far so good, but let's get even sillier. Immediately after screaming loudly about Russians causing civilian casualties, the Americans blow up a hospital in Afghanistan that was run by Médecins sans Frontières, in spite of being informed of its location both before and during the bombing. 'Don't kill civilians... like this!' Could it get any sillier than that? Of course it can: the US can start blatantly, nakedly lying about the event: 'There were Taleban fighters hiding in that hospital!'—no, there weren't; 'The Afghans told us to bomb that hospital!'—no, they didn't. Bombing that hospital was an actual war crime—so says the UN. Are the Russians now going to listen to criticism from war criminals? Don't be silly!

"It's really hard to tell, but anything seems possible now. For example, the US no longer seems to have a foreign policy: the White House says one thing, the State Department another, the Pentagon a third, Samantha Power at the UN pursues a foreign policy of her own using Twitter, and Senator John McCain wants to arm Syrian rebels to shoot down Russian planes. (All five of them? John, don't be silly!) In response to all this confusion, America's political puppets in the European Union are starting to twitch uncontrollably and go off-script, because the nerve center in Washington is no longer sending them clear signals." - Dmitry Orlov, "The World's Silliest Empire," cluborlov.blogspot.com, 10-06-15

NOTE: The embarrassment to the US empire in Syria, in Afghanistan, is coinciding with the demise of the US dollar, particularly the petrodollar, as well as all dollars held internationally. Central banks are on a rampage to dump US dollars. ...

***"
I believe Israel is still the ultimate wild card in the Syrian crisis. A military response from Israel is more than possible, particularly against Iran in retaliation for flooding into the region. Further U.S. involvement, including the greater commitment of major naval assets, is likely. And if the U.S. or Israel escalate, I believe Iran will shut down the Strait of Hormuz, perhaps even with the aid of Russia...Russian President Vladimir Putin has hinted that Israeli activity in Syrian airspace will be obstructed, and reports of some “near misses” between Russian and Israeli fighters have surfaced.

"Currently, U.S. 'relations' with Russia are at lows not seen since the Cold War. In the meantime, the globalists have created a perfect storm of conflicting interests that could very well lead to outright world war. That said, there are different brands of warfare. And, as I pointed out five years ago, the elites do not necessarily need the threat of nuclear war to open the door to collapse.

"Economic warfare would be just as devastating to many parts of the globe and the U.S. in particular, causing massive population reduction through starvation in the span of a few months while leaving large areas of infrastructure intact. Economic warfare is also a perfect distraction of the public eye away from the crimes of international financiers. Our fiscal structure is already in the middle of an implosion set in motion by deliberately destructive central banking policies. But in the midst of economic warfare, such monetary atrocities can simply be blamed on 'the treachery of the East.' The Syrian debacle makes an economic battle scenario between East and West 'believable' for many people around the world.

"Still, wider regional warfare of the shooting variety is certainly guaranteed in the near future.

"Saudi Arabia has denounced Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria and has increased support to 'moderate rebels.' Of course, as we have seen repeatedly in the past couple of years, there are in fact NO moderates in Syria as rebel groups continue to obtain Western money and weapons and then join the ranks of ISIS. The Saudis have made it clear that they will never accept a situation in which the Assad regime continues to hold power in Syria. They have threatened a military response in the event that Assad gains superiority over the insurgency. Keep in mind that the Saudis have already committed forces to Yemen.

"Tensions are also increasing between Saudi Arabia and Iran over Syrian involvement, despite recent Saudi support for the U.S./Iran nuclear deal. The European Council On Foreign Relations has warned that there are now no 'mediators for deescalation' in the region. Of course, this is exactly the way they prefer it.

"Turkey is also now a factor, with Turkish officials claiming airspace violations by Russia, and Turkish forces operating in at least a limited capacity in Syria and Iraq. Syria is a gasoline soaked mess and there are too many potential sparks to keep track of. The globalists have conjured an environment in which a disastrous domino effect is almost guaranteed.

"Another rather unexpected consequence of the Syrian crisis is the now active effort by the elites to initiate a Cloward-Piven strategy using so-called Syrian 'refugees' to destabilize the EU and perhaps even the U.S. Already, the suggested immigration count for such refugees, many of whom are not even from Syria, has risen from 10,000 bound for the U.S. to 100,000. I believe as the crisis continues to grow this number will be increased to 1 million refugees or more bound for the U.S. Expect many extremist elements to be shipped into our borders along with them.

"It is absolutely imperative to remember regardless of what happens next, almost every element of this crisis has been staged. War and economic despair are the ultimate expedient world-changing tools. They wipe the slate nearly clean, as it were, and mold public perception through fear. That which you thought impossible today becomes rather reasonable tomorrow after crisis takes hold; and this includes the final deconstruction of constitutional values, the militarization of our society, the loss of financial prosperity, the extreme degradation of living standards and the ultimate centralization of everything...

"The question today is merely one of timing. How long before a negative trigger is introduced? How long before Israeli planes come into contact with Russian or Iranian fighters? How long before U.S. troops come into contact with Russian troops? How long before Israel or Saudi Arabia strike Iran? And if the U.S. backs out completely, how long before the entire dynamic of the Middle East is flipped and America loses petro-status for the dollar? With the speed of events forming a fiscal-political riptide, it is hard to imagine we will be waiting very long to find out." - Brandon Smith, "Syrian Crisis", www.alt-market.com, 10-07-15

The previous information was compiled from a Christian brother of mine who runs a $400 per year newsletter. He gave me full permission to print and distribute the above news which is not mainstream.
If you wish to subscribe you can contact me for further details or to get this information FREE simply follow my articles which are varied from theology, evangelism, politics, economics, faith, gospel and more.

May the Lord bless you as you continue to seek for truth.
We are living in what I believe is the near return of our Lord Jesus Christ.
World conditions are such that a mass deception is taking place among our religious and political leaders and the enemy, Satan, who is our adversary, is setting things up for further deception to where billions will believe "the lie" per 2 Thessalonians 2:11

Pope Francis is calling for all Protestants to unite with the Roman Catholic church and put down their differences.

For the true disciple of Christ this can not be done. We must contend for the faith once delivered to the saints. (Jude 3)

We must agree to disagree on certain matters.

The Pope is not infallible as he claims. Infallibility belongs to God alone.

Keep the faith and be faithful unto the coming of our Lord.

Carlton Pruitt ministers the gospel to the Los Angeles area.
Formerly a Hollywood actor (SAG member) and junk removal expert he now spends most of his time studying the scriptures, writing articles, hymns and poems and doing street preaching.