In The News

---

Another interesting thing worth pondering , is that the paradigm of the firmament (as shown in the included picture) places waters above the firmament. With my proposed idea that where the "space" above us stops, God begins. This brings new significance, I think, to Jesus, the living man/God coming down to earth and actually saying that he is delivering to any man that believes in Him, "Living Waters". Waters that perhaps come from that mysterious place that is above the firmament , where God dwells? Mysterious, and, unexplainable , yet undeniable, powers, and that part of God that we have come to call the Holy Spirit? It's interesting to note that there are still things about water that man's science doesn't understand and can't really explain. Like how water at times, defies its own expected properties. And how it is said to be able to have memory.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/HVdYGYvak6Y?autoplay=1&FORM=VIRE1&PC=OPALAND


I guess it's a hobby of mine, to try and connect ALL of the weird data points out there in our awareness floating around. In this regard, it's in relation to all of those compelling and oftentimes, quite convincing points made by "flat earthers", that outer space and more specifically, our space program and the massively lucrative program called NASA, isn't REALLY all that they pretend it to be. Or they aren't ALL that we are lead to believe about them. A person could spend hundreds if not many hundreds of hours on the internet looking at much compelling questioning.


One very interesting, "scientific" experiment that seems to validate this, "dome covered, firmament covered earth," was labeled by scientists as "Operation fishbowl". Those 1962 Nuclear missiles sent into the atmosphere and detonated . A most interesting name of this operation. Many speculate that this could have REALLY been an attempt by them to break through that firmament. And some might theorize that they were trying to open a portal to other dimensions. Regardless, the experiments were pretty much thought to be a failure . And a discerning, Biblical worldview-lead mind might be able to read between the lines of what the following summary of the acquired data might be truly saying.

"Despite thorough studies of the meager data, present models of these bursts are sketchy and tentative. These models are too uncertain to permit extrapolation to other altitudes and yields with any confidence. Thus there is a strong need, not only for better instrumentation, but for further tests covering a range of altitudes and yields."[6]

Maybe people just don't see my forthcoming interpretation as applicable because the scientist's description is dressed up and disguised in scientism's religious jargon. But I get ahead of myself.

But an interesting thing that they admitted to learning was this: As the explosion hit against the firmament, its power and resultant flashes were dissipated along the firmament, and were visible in other places along the surface of the dome. (This is my interpretation of the following, taken from wikipedia. You can decide if my interpretation is applicable.)

"The auroras associated with high-altitude nuclear explosions, especially the auroras that appeared almost instantaneously far away from the explosion in the opposite hemisphere, were not clearly understood. The nature of the possible radiation belts that were initially generated along the magnetic field lines connecting the areas of the auroral displays were also poorly understood."

The info on operation fishbowl was rapidly found by a quick Bing search. Here's the wiki entry;

https://sites.google.com/site/trutherswitzerland/emp-terror/operation-fishbowl-1962


Science's admitted ignorance about what they call gravity-

If a Biblical worldview IS the total TRUTH, and if Satan is known as the great deceiver and the destroyer. And, if Satan is the Prince of THIS world (A claim that Jesus didn't deny, and a phrase, or name for Satan that He even used for describing Satan). And, if we human creatures are eternal, free-willed sentient beings that Satan hates, then this could have many incredible implications to our modern worldview. With this framework, I propose that maybe the things we (mankind) believe, and have been mentally or philosophically trained into, "knowing", over and over again as the truth, "scientifically", throughout history, may be radically different than what REALLY is.

I'll point out the truth about science's limitations in regards to its limited understanding of what space REALLY is. I'll Point out science's own admitted failings in truly understanding what gravity and what light even really are. I'll show how, despite their admitted ignorance, those two properties still are what science and astronomy uses to define, or to, "ground", what their ideas are about outer space. And, I will call out the fact that they claim to mathematically and theoretically say that they have no idea what makes up 95 percent of matter and energy. Thus calling it, "dark energy" or, "dark matter". I offer up a conclusion that this, "darkness", is more than just our ignorance, but that it could gloriously be God Himself. (That our little, limited mortal, human brains, collectively throughout the ages, have been methodically trained into thinking of as, "outer space".)

What does the Bible say about things built upon unfirm foundations? Is there a bigger potential human disaster than this one, about outer space? (If science is how we know what we know, and its foundations about outer space are built on sinking sand...) Isn't it quite interesting that the legend about the, "Father, of gravity", Sir Isaac Newton, involved his realization or, "inspiration", about it, after being knocked on the head by a falling apple. (In the year 1666. There's that numeric mark again, that one could explore.) Where was it again, that man, and falling, and an apple, is indeed, legendary?

Here's another excerpt from an interesting article on Mr. Newton that admits scientists don't know what gravity is :

"Quantum mechanics has given us a deeper understanding of our world’s fundamental building blocks, describing it by particles and particle fields. Gravity seems to be the black sheep, that doesn’t quite fit in the rest of the quantum theory to describe the world.

We have four fundamental forces: Gravity, the weak force, the strong force, and the electromagnetic force.

Those last three forces are now described as interacting particles — or the force carriers — that are exchanged between matter particles.

But gravity? We don’t know whether a graviton exists and hence whether gravity can be described with quantum mechanics and united with the other three forces. It’s one of the biggest challenges of our times, which so far has resulted in the string theory as the closest thing to some kind of answer. The game is on."

https://medium.com/predict/isaac-newton-discovered-gravity-while-in-quarantine-

Here's an interesting, simple point to make in regards to science's elusive grip on the, "force", of gravity:

It is in regards to the theory that gravity of the earth is able to hold things in place as the earth spins. That, then becomes the only logical explanation on the "force", working to keep things riding on a spinning ball from flying out into space,(from the centrifugal force created by a spinning earth model) is it not? I'll remind again that science really has no idea of what gravity is, other than observing its effects and creating mathematical formulas on these observable effects. (The Bible says God holds everything together.)

Now, let's just say, for argument's sake, that the earth doesn't really spin. Would gravity still exist? Sure. (Why would it not? We would still be observing it whether the earth is spinning or not). The only thing different about it, (our observation of this, "force", of gravity) would be that science couldn't use that as the reason why we (and all of the things riding on the earth's surface) don't spin off into outer space...
but yet, we wouldn't have to worry about that either, because in the,"argument," the earth isn't spinning.

Can one logically see how that could be science's own circular reasoning, used to prove its theories?

That is definitely a point to consider.

The more credible flat earthers would say that their working theory about why things fall has to do with an electromagnetic, or electrostatic force that attracts an object (with its net positive charge) to the ground's massive negative charge. (Thus always falling, "down " to the ground.) This idea of this electromagnetic force was actually mentioned in that scientific article about, "the graviton," that I quoted. But that fact was hidden, or obscured by the dogmatic scientism priest's language.

Does Deep outer space (The realm beyond what the Bible calls, "The firmament") REALLY exist?

Science's admitted ignorance about light-

As an example of science not truly understanding light, conventional science has much trouble saying whether light is a particle or a wave. They continue to say that it has a "dual nature", depending upon what exactly they are looking for, or measuring. This, I find interesting (the idea that light has a part to play in our expectations, which seems to give it a mind of its own, one could say... or, their theory about light is way off of the mark.) But there are other scientists, like Walter Russell and Nikola Tesla, and several others that contend that particles and waves are only conceptual ways to describe observable phenomenon, and light is ACTUALLY a, "longitudinal disturbance in the ether", and thus it does NOT, "travel", or is not even really, "emitted" from what is thought of as its source. They contend that light isn't even really a "thing", per se. But what we call light, is rather a concept describing its manifestation. Which is more like a "perturbation of the medium that it is observed to be in", much like sound, they say. This would have huge implications to us about what even are the things that we call stars, for example. If they aren't really "emitting" this thing we call light, and light doesnt really even, "travel," at a certain speed, (We only measure the impedance of the thing that we observe and call light traveling through its medium, these scientists say.) And then, would even what science calls, the Big Bang and all of their, "measurements," and their developed theories of its manifest light... what would all of that mean? It could certainly mean that what science tells us about outer space... Well... they aren't REALLY as sure as they pretend to be.

Could another very strong hint to us that we don't REALLY understand light, have been revealed to us in the Plague of darkness brought about to the Land of Egypt in the Book of Exodus? Some had total darkness (that could even be felt... God's Word says. Very interesting) , yet some still had light. THIS phenomenon occurring independant of what that old sun was doing.

Then the Lord said to Moses, “Stretch out your hand toward the sky so that darkness spreads over Egypt—darkness that can be felt.” So Moses stretched out his hand toward the sky, and total darkness covered all Egypt for three days. No one could see anyone else or move about for three days. Yet all the Israelites had light in the places where they lived.

Exodus 10:21‭-‬23 NIV

Throw in science's inability to explain what is called , "non-locality", and "quantum entanglement" , where they found that stimulating a particle in one part of what they call the universe, results in another particle, even on the other side of the Universe, (they say) to react or be agitated simultaneously. But, how do they know this, "universal nature", other than just theory, or just their observation of it on this earth? Some scientists have called this quantum entanglement phenomenon, "The mind of God". Interesting.

Here's an interesting video on our misperceptions of light.

(This guy intelligently and logically deconstructs many " beliefs" about modern science. For anyone interested)

YouTube Video

---

PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BELOW LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE AS A MEMBER OR VISITOR