Return to Content
Read Our Devotional
Opportunities to be Published
The Home for Christian Writers! Matthew 6:33
ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BY COMMENTING
Add to Favorites
A Reply To A Statement Of Stephen Jay Gould, By An Amateur
Author requests article critique
Steven Jay Gould, a geologist, paleontologist and college professor, made this statement of evolution in an article featured in Scientific American:
“Natural Selection is an immensely powerful yet beautifully
simple theory that has held up remarkably well, under
intense and unrelenting scrutiny and testing, for 135 years.*”
In that statement, Gould makes no less than three statements. Breaking the quote down, he says that (a.) Natural Selection is an immensely powerful theory, (b.) Natural Selection is a beautifully simple theory and (c.) Natural Selection has held up remarkably well, under intense and unrelenting scrutiny and testing, for 135 years.
There is no doubt that Natural Selection is remarkably powerful. Hardly a week, or possibly a day, goes by without one hearing of it. This factor is not in debate and is only mentioned in fairness.
However, Gould also asserts that evolution is a beautifully simple theory. Why is it then, that one hundred articles are published every year, to explain this simple theory? Why then, is it necessary that almost one hundred new books are published every year, many of them in excess of five hundred pages, for the purpose of patching Darwin’s original work? Why is it that Origin of the Species needed to utilize between one hundred and fifty thousand to two hundred thousand words, just to explain this simple theory? Why is it that this "Origin of the Species," actually needed such an explanatory title such as "The Origin of the Species By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," with a total of twenty-one words or one hundred and eighteen characters, if you include the spaces?
Gould calls evolution, not just simple, but beautifully simple. Beautiful means attractive to the eye, and one might add, without blemish. Others might say that beauty comes in spite of blemishes, of which, in Evolution’s case, there are many. This brings me to my third and final point.
Gould states that Natural Selection has held up remarkably well, under intense and unrelenting scrutiny and testing, for 135 years. Is this the case? The evidence is plain. If natural selection has held up so well, then why have there been over one hundred books published every year, just to mend Darwin’s original works? A garment that has received in one year as many patches as evolution has could not be said to be holding up well.
Amazingly, this scrutiny has not been, as one would suspect, only from the outside. Mr. Stephen Jay Gould has punched many a hole and sown many a patch, himself. The idea of Punctuated Equilibrium, Gould's own theory, is totally absent from Origin of the Species.
Three points, pulled from one sentence, located on one of seven pages, in one article from Mr. Stephen Jay Gould, is hardly a rebuttal. Within the span of a day, Gould could write, proofread and schedule the publication of an article that would undoubtedly undo what is written here. Stephen Jay Gould could, were he alive, do that, but then, it would not be one hundred articles written to defend evolution, but one hundred and one.
Finally, it must be said, that there is yet another statement which is immensely powerful and beautifully simple, which has held up remarkably well, under intense and unrelenting scrutiny and testing, for almost two thousand years. That statement is that Jesus Christ is Lord.
Natural Selection has not endured the hatred that Christianity has. Darwin was not crucified, nor was he stoned, nor was he burned, or boiled, or hanged, or poisoned.
* Quote taken from The Evolution of Life on Earth, by Stephen Jay Gould; Scientific American Special, Volume 14, Number 2, 2004
PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BELOW
LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
Reader Count & Comments
27 Nov 2004
This article opens up an area of intense debate. Thank you for shining light here. As apologetics writers we must be aware of both form and substance. Scholarly form requires citing sources used (Dr. Gould's quotation), some information regarding the author where appropriate. If the audience does not know the author then birth, death and some history are important wheter in the text or in a footnote. Content requires that we present debate in a logical, step-by-step format because readers can not be counted on to understand jumps in reasoning. Here the jump from natural selection to evolution is made. Does
natural selection equate to evolution? Is it important? Why?
Marvelous area of study needing informed and vocal students. Keep studying and writing!! Greg. Eckrich
This article has been read
times < Previous |
Read more articles by
or search for other articles by topic below.
Search for articles on: (e.g. creation; holiness etc.)
Read more by clicking on a link:
Main Site Articles
Most Read Articles
Highly Acclaimed Challenge Articles
New Release Christian Books for Free for a Simple Review
NEW - Surprise Me With an Article - Click here for a random URL
God is Not Against You - He Came on an All Out Rescue Mission to Save You
...in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them... 2 Cor 5:19
Therefore, my friends, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. Acts 13:38
LEARN & TRUST JESUS HERE
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com.
FaithWriters offers Christian reading material for Christian readers. We offer Christian articles, Christian fiction, Christian non-fiction, Christian Bible studies, Christian poems, Christian articles for sale, free use Christian articles, Christian living articles, New Covenant Christian Bible Studies, Christian magazine articles and new Christian articles. We write for Jesus about God, the Bible, salvation, prayer and the word of God.
Link To Us
Become A Member