History

PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BY COMMENTING
LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE As A Member OR Visitor
Message Writer
Hire Writer
Report Article

Track Writer

Add to Favorites

by GLENN PEASE
01/15/18
Free to Share

Based on Gal. 5:1-15

       Until every knee bows and every tongue confesses that Jesus Christ is Lord, the abuse of power will be a major cause of human suffering. When the country of Chad in Africa became independent in 1960 the Christian missionaries were delighted that the first President was a Baptist. Tambolboye was converted by Baptist missionaries and taught in a Baptist school, and now he is a political leader of the land. It was a dream come true, but the dream soon became a nightmare. He established dictatorial powers and imprisoned his army commander. He began a systematic persecution of the Baptist. He began to force his people to restore the old pagan rights of sacrifice to ancestral spirits. He revived the secret ceremonies of flogging, facial scaring and drugs. The Baptist refused to cooperate, and so their homes were ransacked and their lives threatened. Christian children were taken away to concentration camps. One pastor who refused to let his child go was shot.

        Many of the Baptist missionaries were arrested and expelled. All Baptist churches and schools were closed. Other Christians were left alone, but the Baptists were persecuted. Why? Tambolboye as a young man had been a Baptist, and as a young man he was disciplined for some unchristian behavior. Now he was in a position of great power, and he was using his power to get revenge. You might say he was a devil in disguise. That could very well be, but it could also be that he was indeed a Christian. He organized a state church called The Evangelical Church of Chad.    He was not only a professing Christian, but he was also an evangelical.

       He made two pastors the two top officials in his government, and they began to force all Christians to conform to the state church. Many died resisting. Pastors were tortured and had their fingers broken and some were even buried alive. It was a horrible time, but finally in 1975 an army officer fed up with the violence stormed the presidential palace and killed the first Christian President of Chad. You may think it borders on blasphemy to even call such a monster a Christian, but let me remind you that Christians all through history have believed and practiced just what he did. They have believed it is right for Christians in political power to use force to coerce other Christians into conformity with their convictions. It was even considered right to kill them if they would not comply.

       It is true that the first Christians were persecuted by the Jews, and Paul was one of the worst. He would use his authority to arrest and kill Christians, and he was committed to use force to drive Christians off the face of the earth. It is true that the non-Christian Romans were the next great persecutors of the church, and in the first 3 centuries they wrote some of the bloodiest chapters of church history. But the fact is, the majority of the persecution of Christians in history has been done by other Christians, who had political power, and who abused that power by using force to make other Christians conform.

       We don't have time to go through history to illustrate this, but if you have even a general knowledge of Church history you will be aware that the official Catholic position has always been this: When the Catholic church is in control of political power in a state, that power should be used to force the citizens to conform to Catholic doctrine. It is not only right, it is an obligation of the state to kill those who refuse to conform, but remain heretics. If you know history, you know that they practice what they preach, and many thousands of Christians died because other Christians said they had no right to be different from the Christians in control of state power.

       Surprisingly the Protestant Reformation did not change this, and Luther and Calvin followed the Catholic conviction. When the church had power to coerce others into conformity, it was to use that power. The result is that when Protestants gained power in the state they got even with the Catholics. Now it was their turn, and they persecuted the Catholics. They imprisoned and killed them for not conforming to the Protestants. Luther spurred on state troops to kill thousands of Anabaptists for their brand of Christianity. Calvin even had a fellow theologian, by the name of Servetus, burned at the stake because of theological differences. The reformers believed that the state should punish people for wrong religious beliefs, and anything was wrong that was not their belief.

       When we come to the history of England it was more of the same. It seemed like every Christian who got into power felt it was his or her calling to destroy other Christians who would not conform to their convictions. We all think of Henry VIII and his poor beheaded wives, but seldom does anyone realize that his real pleasure beheading Catholic and Anabaptist leaders. He was the head of the Church of England. It was the state church, and so the power of the state was used to force all into conformity with the religious beliefs of those in power. In the mid 1500's the Purtain movement began to cleanse the Church of England and to purify it of all its Catholic traditions. It was a powerful back to the Bible movement, and it took the church in the right direction. But what was their view of religious freedom? It was the same old thing. If other Christians would not conform they were to be imprisoned, banished or killed.

       It seemed like Christians were doomed to be their own worst enemies, and to go on perpetually fulfilling Paul's warning in verse 15: "If you keep on biting and devouring each other watch out, or you will be destroyed by each other." From the New Testament church up to the late 1500's the conviction and practice of the majority of Christians had been to use force to make other Christians bow to their ideas of what was right. Then something happened that changed the course of history and led to you and I having the privilege of living in a land where no leader of our government can lift a finger to force us to conform to any religious belief or practice. None can punish us when we refuse any conformity to another's religious belief. Something happened that led to Christians finally having the liberty of not needing to conform to other Christians who happened to be in positions of power. A Catholic, a Jew or a Protestant can be President of the United States, but he has no power to compel any American to conform to his beliefs.

      What happened to bring this unique religious liberty into the world? It was the idea of the separation of the church and state. Robert Browne, the well educated Anabaptist announced in London in the 1570's that Scripture alone should be followed in matters of faith and Christian living, and that the church should be independent of government control. This was heresy, and he had to flee Holland, but his idea spread. John Smyth was a pastor in the Church of England, and he studied this idea and concluded that it was right. He withdrew from the Church of England and formed his own independent church. Two of his members became very famous in American history. William Brewster and William Bradford who became leaders of the Pilgrims who came over on the Mayflower. They settled in Plymouth and developed democracy that influenced the history of our country.

       John Smyth was forced to flee to Holland by King James in 1603, but by 1611 some of his followers under the leadership of Thomas Helwys came back to England. On the edge of London they founded the first Baptist church on English soil. King James hated Baptists, but the Bible named after him as the King James Version was published that very year of 1611. By means of it the Baptists were able to convince many that the King was not to have authority over the church. The church was separate from the state, and only God's Word can be the authority for the church. The state has no business trying to regulate or control the people of God.

       John Smyth wrote this before he died in 1612: "The magistrate, by virtue of his office, is not to meddle with religion, or matters of conscience, nor to compel men to this or that form of religion or doctrine, but to leave the Christian religion to the free conscience of every one, and to meddle only with political matters." This was the beginning of that which made Baptists the most unique group of Christians in history up to that point. They became the only Christians in history who both preached and practiced religious liberty and the separation of church and state.

       Roger Williams was the young Englishman who was captivated by this new idea. He became the tool God used to make America the only nation in history to grant full religious freedom. As Americans we love our nation and so we seldom look at its negative side. But the facts are that America began with Christians acting just like most all the Christians of history. They felt that religious freedom was a form of evil. They felt they had a right to force all other Christians to believe the same and worship the same. They felt is was an obligation to arrest, banish or kill them if they would not conform.

       If you think the early Christians of America like the idea of freedom of worship, you are wrong. They despised the idea. When Roger Williams came to the colonies with this Baptist nonsense of religious liberty he was immediately hated by the Puritan leaders of Massachusetts. They believed the Bible to be the Word of God, and they loved this land, and they were brothers in Christ, but they held to the same old thinking that those in power had the right and obligation to use that power to force others to conform. Williams made a lot of enemies by preaching the idea of separation of church and state. He declared that the Puritans had no right to arrest and imprison people who differed from them.

       John Cotton was the most brilliant and prominent minister in Massachusetts. He knew Roger Williams in England, and they were brothers in Christ. But now in this new land they became bitter
opponents. Cotton was the defender of the Puritans controlling the church and state. He and Roger Williams debated this issue in letters for years, and we have all this debate on record. John Cotton was a godly Christian pastor, but he could not be persuaded that God ever intended men to have religious liberty. He was absolutely convinced that Christians should persecute and kill those who would not conform to the truth, as he and other Puritans understood it.

       Roger Williams would not conform and give up the idea of separation of church and state, and so Cotton and all the other pastors brought him to the General Court in 1635 and banished him from the colony. This only made Roger Williams all the more convinced of the evil of linking the church and state. It was evil that he as a child of God was banished because other children of God did not like his ideas, and they had the civil power to kick him out and shut him up. Williams could look at Gal. 5:1, which reads, "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery." He decided he would be stubborn and fight for his conviction, and for the freedom of all men to hold to their conviction.

       He fled from Massachusetts and founded his own colony of Rhode Island with Providence as its capital, for only by the providence of God did he survive and have the strength to found this colony. That small colony in this land of ours was the only place on our planet where there was complete and total religious liberty. The government did not try to control people's religious faith or form of worship. That was the only government ever controlled by Christians who did not use their power to make other Christians conform to their convictions. Roger also founded there the First Baptist Church in America, and that was the start of the Baptist movement that slowly but surely influenced the whole of our nation to come to the recognition of the value of separation of church and state. It was a long hard battle, and many Baptists had to suffer terrible persecution, but one by one the colonies began to grant religious liberty.

       When the Constitution was adopted the Baptist sent a delegation to Madison and Washington to talk about the need for religious liberty and protection from a strong central government. They knew history and knew that noble intentions of even good and godly men are not enough. Man's nature is corrupt, and he needs to be controlled by power outside himself. John Leland, the Baptist champion of freedom wrote, "Experience has informed us that the fondness of magistrates to foster Christianity has done it more harm than all the persecutions ever did."

        The Baptists wanted assurance that American leaders would not abuse their power and interfere with the church. Washington urged congress to consider the Baptist concern, and the end result was the First Amendment to the Constitution. It says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." By this sentence every American has a guarantee of religious liberty, for this sentence builds a wall of separation between the church and the state. We have what Christians all through history never had, and that is the freedom to believe what we are convinced is true regardless of what any other group of Christians believes, and regardless of what any government official believes. By means of the separation of church and state American Christians became the first fully free Christians in history.

       Many of the Christian groups that enjoyed power under the old system still strive to regain that power. Any time you hear of a Christian who preaches against the separation of church and state, you will find if you check out his background that he likely comes out of a church that once persecuted other Christians and forced them into conformity. In churches where people are made Christian by the authority of the church you will find the strong desire to control the state. The Catholic Church makes Christians by baptism. It is not a free choice of the individual, but a matter of authority. This kind of theology leads to the view that if we can only control the state we can make more Christians. Politics is always more important to those Christian groups who hope to use it to force others to conform to their views.

       The Baptist Joint Committee On Public Affairs in Washington, D.C. exists to watch for and fight any attempt of a Christian group to gain the power to force any religious conviction on any other person in America. Let us not be deceived, for the issue is not the good guys against the bad guys on this matter. It is not Christians against anti-Christian forces. The fight for religious liberty has always been, and will always be, a fight for Christians to be free from the power of other Christians to force them into conformity. Atheists don't care much what you believe as long as you don't try to cram it down their throat. It is Christians who want to make others believe as they do.

       It is one of those traits of fallen human nature that does not go away when people become Christians. It is like lust, and no matter how good a Christian you are, you are still tempted to lust. And so also, no matter how good a Christian you are, you are tempted to abuse power. The separation of church and state is mandatory by the first amendment because no body can be trusted to keep them separate by good intentions alone. It has to be the law of the land, or even the best of people can be a problem.

       When John Clarke, Obadiah Holmes and John Crandall came into Massachusetts in 1651 they stayed in a home not far from Boston. There they began to share their Baptist faith to a handful of people. Two constables came while John Clarke was speaking and arrested the 3 of them and took them to Boston. When they asked what law that had broken they were informed that denying the value of infant baptism was a capital offense. The Governor, John Endecott, came and told them they had violated the law of the state and were worthy of death, but they would be find instead and made to leave the colony. One of them was beaten first.

       Persecutions of the Baptists were not done by unbelievers, but were done by those among the finest, most intelligent and committed of Christians. That is why they in mercy did not kill these helpless men. Had they not been Christians they might have done so. All of the Christian leaders agreed that it was right to kill those who taught error, and error was whatever was not in agreement with their understanding. Had the Baptists not won their battle for religious liberty the prisons of this land would be filled, not with criminals only, but with Christians who did not believe that infant baptism was the key to salvation. America would not be the land of the free if there was no separation of church and state.

       Separation does not mean that the church and state do not cooperate for the common good of the people. When they can influence each other for the common good that is fine as long as there is mutual agreement, and one does not interfere with the other. Influence is okay, but interference is not. The wall that separates me from my neighbor is for our mutual privacy and independence, but we are free to cooperate in any way that is mutually beneficial. The wall is for protection against abuse and not to prevent mutually beneficial goals. The wall that separates men's and women's rooms is also for mutual privacy and protection, but it does not mean that men and women cannot cooperate in all ways that are mutually beneficial.

       Separation does not mean that Christian people are not to participate in the state. Most of our Presidents were church going people, and most politicians are. The church and the state are often the same people, but their powers are separated. As church leaders they have no power in the state, and as state leaders they have no power in the church. They are separated, but they cannot help but influence their roles in each area. Separation does not mean that religious conviction cannot become a part of state policy. It was the religious conviction about the depravity of man that led to a Constitution that kept a careful balance of power to prevent tyranny. Religious convictions should influence state policy. Chuck Colson says that religious convictions in political arenas are the only hope because politics without religion has no answer to man's problems. Christians need to be in politics and be making a major difference in political direction, but none of this involves making laws, which establish religion or prohibit its free exercise.

       What separation does mean is that all true religious faith is a matter of free choice, and so no state power can ever be rightly used to enforce faith or any religious conviction. Force is proper to compel obedience to laws, but there can be no laws that force a religious conviction on anyone. You might object that, "Thou shalt not murder," is a religious conviction. But this is not a religious law, for it is a universal natural and civil law. Even non-believers and atheists do not want to be murdered. Secular people as well as religious people want this law enforced, and so when a law is universal it is not merely a religious conviction, and so it is a matter
for the state to enforce.

       Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy is not universal and secular. It is a religious law, and so the state cannot make any laws that compel anyone to obey it, or which prohibits anyone from obeying it. That is why there can be no state sponsored prayers in public schools. The public school is state operated, and so it cannot compel any student to do anything that is religious. Prayer is religious, and the state has no power to control anything that is religious, for that is the realm of the church. However, any person has the right to pray anywhere at any time without interference from the state. Students can pray in public schools anytime they want, and it is against the law to stop them. What is forbidden is for the state to try and make anyone pray. That is what the separation of church and state is all about.

        Separation means that people in America are protected from state sponsored indoctrination on religious subjects.   Many Christians believe the state should indoctrinate youth on religious subjects. What they mean is what they have meant all through history, and that is, let us use state power to get out convictions imposed on others. If you child had a Jewish public school teacher who taught them that Jesus was just a Jewish Rabbi, and not the Son of God, you would be terribly upset. If he or she was a Mormon or Buddhist teaching your child some of their religious ideas, you would be horrified. But you are protected from this kind of thing because state employees cannot indoctrinate your children in religion.

     Many Christians would love it if they had the right to indoctrinate all the public school children in the Christian faith. But why should the Jewish parents be less upset if their children come home and say they are being taught that Jesus is the Messiah? Yes it is true, but it is not the state that is to teach that. If the church wants to use the state to teach that, the church wants to destroy that which makes America the land of liberty that it is. Destroy the wall of separation between church and state and you plunge our nation back into the Middle Ages, and you lose what it took centuries to achieve. Christians do not see with historical eyes, but only with self-centered eyes when they want to break down the wall of separation and use the state to help them achieve their religious goals.

       Baptists fear such people, for no matter how godly and how much they love the Lord and His Word, Christians who gain state power to enforce their convictions are always the most dangerous people on earth for other Christians who have differing ideas. That is why Baptists fought for the First Amendment wall of separation. Christians with state power have always been primary cause of suffering in the body of Christ. We have a land where we are protected from such Christians. The result is that we have escaped the enormous suffering that millions of Christians have had to endure at the hands of brothers in Christ.

        I shudder to think what I would do if I had the political power to force everybody in America to conform to my religious convictions. I do not doubt that I abuse that power, and like most Christians of the past bring suffering upon those who refused to cooperate. Thank God that I cannot get such power, nor can any other Christian in America, and because of this we are the freest Christians who have ever lived.

        Hitler was an anti-Christ, but remember that all the suffering he caused for Jews and Christians was not just because he was evil. It took the cooperation of millions of Christians to get him the power he needed to do his evil. Hitler needed a church that would be one with the state, and be an obedient tool of the state. It was part of German history that the state and church be linked, and that state power be used to enforce religious convictions. Luther and Calvin both supported this link. The idea of a free church was not a part of German thinking. When Hitler wanted all the churches to be united, many Christian leaders saw the chance for unity and power for the church in Germany. They went along with Hitler and formed the German Evangelical Church. The motive of Christian leaders was power for the church. They wanted power to make Germany more Christian.

       The use of political force to bring people into subjection was a part of the Christian heritage of Luther and Calvin. Hitler wanted to help the church, and his willingness to use power to do this did not bother Christians who felt this was legitimate when you are trying to promote the truth of God. Being anti-Semitic and killing Jews was not Christian, but it was for the sake of Christian and national purity, and so Christians went along. If Christians kill other Christians for the sake of power, why not kill Jews for the same reason? We are aghast that Christians could cooperate in such terrible evil, and yet theses are the facts of life.

       If it was not for the First Amendment in the Constitution there is no reason to believe that Christians would not be arresting and killing Jews in America, or if not Jews, then those of some other faith or religion. There is not a Christian alive who can say he would not abuse power if he had the power to force others into conformity. We are only safe from the oppression of other Christians because of the wall of separation. If that wall falls nobody is safe in their religious convictions. Everything that is most precious about America is protected by the wall of separation. Thank God for the separation of church and state.

PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BELOW LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE AS A MEMBER OR VISITOR

Reader Count & Comments

Date

Read more articles by GLENN PEASE or search for other articles by topic below.

Search for articles on: (e.g. creation; holiness etc.)

Read more by clicking on a link:
Free Reprints
Main Site Articles
Most Read Articles
Highly Acclaimed Challenge Articles.
New Release Christian Books for Free for a Simple Review.
God is Not Against You - He Came on an All Out Rescue Mission to Save You

...in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them... 2 Cor 5:19

Therefore, my friends, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. Acts 13:38

LEARN & TRUST JESUS HERE

FaithWriters offers Christian reading material for Christian readers. We offer Christian articles, Christian fiction, Christian non-fiction, Christian Bible studies, Christian poems, Christian articles for sale, free use Christian articles, Christian living articles, New Covenant Christian Bible Studies, Christian magazine articles and new Christian articles. We write for Jesus about God, the Bible, salvation, prayer and the word of God.