Hire
Writers
Editors
Home Tour About Read What's New Help Forums Join
My Account Login
Shop
Save
Support
E
Book
Store
Learn
About
Jesus
  

Four Ways For A Christian Writer To Win A Publishing Package HERE



The HOME for Christian writers! The Home for Christian Writers!
The Official Writing Challenge

BACK TO
CHALLENGE
MAIN

INSTRUCTIONS

how it works
submission rules
guidelines for
choosing a level

ENTRIES

submit your entry
read current entries
read past entries
challenge winners



Our Daily Devotional HERE
Place it on your site or
receive it daily by email.





TRUST JESUS TODAY

TRY THE TEST



Share
how it works   Submit

Previous Challenge Entry (Level 3 – Advanced)
Topic: Handout (04/14/11)

TITLE: Beast of Burden
By Kim Hamlin
04/17/11


 LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
 SEND A PRIVATE COMMENT
 ADD TO MY FAVORITES

In the summer of 1996, Congress passed, and the President signed, the "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act." It was heralded as a major overhaul, but only the administration of it was transferred to the states, and funding still came from Washington. Since they were still administering funding, the feds provided some new rules: welfare recipients would be kicked off the plan in five years and they had to find a job within two years.

Welfare reform didnít save taxpayer dollars. Our tax dollars are still spent to help welfare recipients get a job. Tax dollars are still used by state governments to subsidize private-sector jobs. Tax dollars still allow states to create government jobs, and tax dollars still pay for health and day care for welfare recipients. Does it seem ironic to you that if you make it attractive for some to get off welfare, it also makes it attractive for others to join the ranks? If I lost my job, it might be worthwhile to sign up and let the state find me a new job in a couple years. They can also provide me with some health and day care while I get some writing done.

Other reforms have been suggested and researched. But, any reform would have been ridiculous because the core of welfare is rotten. It begins with a flawed principle that can never be corrected or improved upon. The nature of the beast forces self-supporting people to fork over money to those who donít. The needs of those who don't have adequate means are then the responsibility of those who do. The beast discourages production and defeats us all.

The beast fosters dependence and mediocrity, but we must all remember that no one is forced to take welfare. Big Brother may tempt you to become dependent, but the choice is always yours. The abolishment of welfare will leave some people struggling. There are those who truly lack the wherewithal, work ethic or ambition to thrive. They will fail. Private charitable acts will help some, but not all people. This assistance cannot be guaranteed. The reality is that neither wellness nor success is a right. Fortunately, we all have the right to liberty.

Both welfare recipients and taxpayers are victims. Government licensing requirements, the minimum-wage law, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), lack of immigration reform and other government intrusions into the free market all choke the weakest in society. The state has blocked the pathway out. People have to contend with bureaucrats enforcing labor legislation designed to keep people unemployed. But unmistakably, some manage to overcome those obstacles and succeed.

Many will clamor that we have a moral obligation to help the poor. Even if you are one of these people, does it seem logical that the government should coerce or enforce it? Compelling morality is an oxymoron. If an act is coerced, itís no longer a choice. If it isnít a choice, then it has no place in any discussion of morality. Some argue that if we have a right to life, then we must have the means to continue living, and welfare provides those resources. A right to life that endorses the right to steal from others is a contradiction. All justification for welfare is rationalization of theft.

Welfare cannot make the donor moral or defend the right to life. It just redistributes assets. The only solution is eradication. Reform is an illusion. For those who want to give their money to those in need, they may do so. Once welfare has been abolished, we will then live in a free country.


The opinions expressed by authors may not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com.
Accept Jesus as Your Lord and Savior Right Now - CLICK HERE
JOIN US at FaithWriters for Free. Grow as a Writer and Spread the Gospel.


This article has been read 334 times
Member Comments
Member Date
Leola Ogle 04/21/11
Great article....it may not be popular with some, but it needs to be said. Thanks for being bold enough to share! God bless!
Shann Hall-LochmannVanBennekom 04/23/11
I like that you stated your opinion clearly, I don't agree with everything you say the system is definitely broken. But I do believe we should help the young mho are helpless and the sick who are truly ill and cannot work and the elderly that should be respected. Unfortunately, there are people who take gross advantage of the system and with that I totally agree withyour. Nice job.
Linda Goergen04/26/11
Very good presentation of your opinion on this, explained clearly and fits the subject of this weeks challenge well.
Noel Mitaxa 05/23/11
Socialism is the form of government that eventually runs out of everyone else's money. You've stated your case very well.