Hire
Writers
Editors
Home Tour About Read What's New Help Forums Join
My Account Login
Shop
Save
Support
E
Book
Store
Learn
About
Jesus
  

Win A Publishing Package HERE            

The HOME for Christian writers! The Home for Christian Writers!
The Official Writing Challenge

BACK TO
CHALLENGE
MAIN

INSTRUCTIONS

how it works
submission rules
guidelines for
choosing a level

ENTRIES

submit your entry
read current entries
read past entries
challenge winners



Our Daily Devotional HERE
Place it on your site or
receive it daily by email.





TRUST JESUS TODAY

TRY THE TEST



Share
how it works   Submit

Previous Challenge Entry (Level 3 – Advanced)
Topic: The Critique/Review (for writers) (05/06/10)

TITLE: The Syllabus
By dub W
05/10/10


 LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
 SEND A PRIVATE COMMENT
 ADD TO MY FAVORITES

As was my practice on the first day of class, I handed out the course syllabus and my personal rules for success in English 101. Each student was to sign an affidavit acknowledging they had received said materials and understood each and every possible facet of the syllabus and other documents. At best, the exercise was a time filler on the first day but also exposed me to how gullible my students were by signing something they could not possibly understand – a factor I am sure would some day follow them into other contractual relationships, thus keeping the courts busy settling simple misunderstandings. Nonetheless, in my many years of teaching, only once did a student question the signing of the document, and not for the social implications of the future, but because she was worried about her privacy.

Allow me to explain. One line of the syllabus states, “…all essays will be peer reviewed.”

A simple sentence that meant students would read and critique each other’s work.

I will always remember the young lady, and that day, because she interrupted my otherwise repetitive presentation with frantic hand waving. “Professor.” She shouted from the back of the room, hand extended to the ceiling and alternately striking the ball cap of a student seated next to her. “Sir.”

I paused. “Yes?”

Her hand was still in the air. “Does this mean that someone is going to read what I write?”

I sat on the edge of the desk. “Indeed, each of your essays will be peer reviewed, critiqued, and generally edited.”

She finally lowered her hand. “But, I don’t want anyone to read what I write.”

“Oh.” I did my best to seem offended. “Then, why write?”

“I just want to learn to write better.” Her answer was expected.

“And,” I paused for effect. “Your better writing, who will read it?”

She looked down at the paperwork. “I don’t know.”

“That is exactly right. “ I slipped off of the desk. “We don’t know who will read our writing. We don’t know if they will like it or not.”

“The class seemed to be paying attention so I continued on. “We who write something are peer edited each time. The advantage you have in this classroom is that the editing is in-house, nobody but your peer and I will see it. Mistakes that you make, or that your peer makes will be corrected, thus making your writing even more readable. Is that understandable?

I looked around the room; there were a few nods, but mostly deadpan faces.

“There’s nothing embarrassing about being edited in this closed vacuum. We grow through editing. Folks who will not be as kind will read your writing in future. Consider yourself lucky to have a friendly face helping you, and you in turn helping them.

A young man, near the front, raised a finger. “But, it’s my stuff, I can choose who reads it, right?”

“Perhaps, but follow this. Writing is like renting an apartment, or a dorm room. Yeah, you can decorate it anyway you want to.”

“As long as you don’t kick holes in the wall,” shouted another student.

“Exactly right.” I tossed the syllabi on the table with a noticeable “whack;” a technique I learned in grad school. The effect was that all attention came to me. “If you kick a hole in the wall you have to fix it.”

I saw some hands starting to go up, so I quickly added, “it’s the same with writing. You are given a clean sheet of paper. You write on it, but if there is an error, your peer editor, just like the contractor hired by the apartment owner, comes in and fixes the problem.”

The hands seemed to recede.

“Like I said, we may have created the writing, but we don’t own it. The reader owns it. The reader decides what is good or bad, what they like or dislike, or what is not written correctly. And, on Wednesday, we are going to talk about that reader, who we call audience.”

A commotion in the hallway caused me to glance at my watch. Class time was over. “On the way out of the room place your signed affidavits on the desk.”

Students began to rise.

“Have a good day, and I’ll see you Wednesday.”


The opinions expressed by authors may not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com.
Accept Jesus as Your Lord and Savior Right Now - CLICK HERE
JOIN US at FaithWriters for Free. Grow as a Writer and Spread the Gospel.


This article has been read 350 times
Member Comments
Member Date
Marilyn Schnepp 05/15/10
Thanks for sharing your viewpoints with us.
Beth LaBuff 05/15/10
I had to smile at the affidavit each student was required to sign and your "how gullible my students were…" and "other contractual relationships…keeping the courts busy..." I think I need to have my university student daughter read this. :)
Brenda Shipman 05/16/10
What a creative setting and format to convey these truths! The dialogue was believable, and the concepts sure challenged my own way of looking at writing and reading. Having been a teacher, I loved your MC's cleverness. Wish I'd tried this on my own students many years ago.
Kate Oliver Webb05/18/10
Very interesting take on the topic, and very well-written. Your MC's statements are thought-provoking, as they should be.
Catrina Bradley 05/18/10
I like this for the great advice the professor gives - and for the crisp writing and clear scene you set of course. I saw a few very minor punctuation typos, but nothing story altering. The first paragraph is a little long; you might break it into two, and after that your story moves into flashback, but doesn't seem to return. Was the flashback necessary? Overall, I enjoyed this one very much--one of your best entries lately inho. :) Cat
Sara Harricharan 05/19/10
Ahh, reminds me of my first college comp classes...had to sign the pesky Syllabus too. Heehee! good authentic feel to this and I liked the way the prof explained Peer reviews. I remember doing those too...whew!
Verna Cole Mitchell 05/19/10
You've offered some of the clearest reasons I've seen for the need of peer editing.(This is really hard for very young teens because they want to make good comments for their friends or the more popular kids.)
Carole Robishaw 05/19/10
Good job Dub, thought provoking. Who AM I writing for?
Mildred Sheldon05/19/10
I enjoyed this very much. It's true about writing. Who are we writing for? I write for the glory of God and I pray I'm able to bring that point to the fore, but that lay with the readers and how they view my writing.
Kristi Peifer05/19/10
I enjoyed this! A couple things I'd still like to know--fiction or non-fiction? Did the girl ever sign the syllabus? ;)
Lyn Churchyard05/19/10
I wouldn't have a problem with my peers reading my work if I was doing a course, but to stand up in front of the group and read it out would be pure nightmare material. What your MC told the students about their writing improving with peer editing is not very different to what happens here on FW. Still, I'm sure glad we don't have to sign an affidavit :-)
Rachel Phelps05/20/10
Great way to discuss critiquing in an more creative way. Loved the class members!