Hire
Writers
Editors
Home Tour About Read What's New Help Forums Join
My Account Login
Shop
Save
Support
E
Book
Store
Learn
About
Jesus
  



The HOME for Christian writers! The Home for Christian Writers!
The Official Writing Challenge

BACK TO
CHALLENGE
MAIN

INSTRUCTIONS

how it works
submission rules
guidelines for
choosing a level

ENTRIES

submit your entry
read current entries
read past entries
challenge winners



Our Daily Devotional HERE
Place it on your site or
receive it daily by email.





TRUST JESUS TODAY

TRY THE TEST



Share
how it works   Submit

Previous Challenge Entry (Level 1 – Beginner)
Topic: The Critique/Review (for writers) (05/06/10)

TITLE: The Critique (ii)
By
05/10/10


 LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
 SEND A PRIVATE COMMENT
 ADD TO MY FAVORITES

The Critique

I had been in the writing group over a year. My writing improved over the course of the year as well as my ability to critique five written pages. Five pages were all we were allowed to submit at a time. After turning in five double-line spaced pages to the other writers, one was sure to get an earful from their mistakes whether imagined or not. The writing group shook a group of pages as a pack of hungry wolves tearing apart a poor rabbit. More than once I didn’t submit a weekly offering of my writing because I knew it would be tossed around with searing criticism making me feel more foolish than I already felt.

I wasn’t afraid of this peer group of novice writers, only wary – extremely wary. We were all “wanna be writers”. No one had a flurry of projects that had been published. Most of us were trying to get our first or second book published. As we worked on our own manuscripts we learned new techniques for writing and eagerly shared our new found skills with others by criticizing our colleagues work with these newly discovered skills. The quality of our work became apparent to each other over the weeks.

One writer, Margaret, had a style of writing beautiful descriptions. She could write fantastic beach scenes, mountain settings, or show the sprawl of an urban ghetto. Sam, who was writing an autobiography, was so engaging that I eagerly waited each week wanting to find out what he had done next in his life. Betty, a divorced mother of three, was writing a story of a horse traveling in a circus. There were four other writers, all talented except for one - Andy.

Andy, a bubbling retired military man full of enthusiasm for writing, helped round out the writing group with his jovial personality. Mr. Andrew Spicer, 75 years young, appeared as someone worthy of respect and dignity, but humorously. His personality gave a stern image but with a beguiling smile. Mr. Spicer, although very intelligent, was not quite a genius. Mr. Spicer did not aspire to be a writer early in life. He didn’t start writing until age 65 and his writing showed it.

His characters were stiff, usually only-one sided. Sometimes they took different sides, such as caring, inquisitive, as well as a fighter, but only after prodding from the writers group. When Andy, as we affectionately called him, joined the writer’s group we were merciful to him. Everyone gave lavish praises first and then later a minor rebuke for grammar errors or an incoherent paragraph. After awhile we all ganged up against him and belittled his writing to the point where I could barely keep from laughing at him.

Andy didn’t take the criticism lightly. In the ensuing weeks he began to mumble as he read. He seemed to lose interest in the other writers. He became almost laconic at the meetings. One night when Andy wasn’t around, I suggested that the writing group change its criticism of Andy’s writing and only embellish Andy with latitudes of praise. What harm could we do to the old man by giving him praises?

Slowly, spasmodically, Andy’s writing came to life. He began to work hard on his writing. While thanking everyone for their criticisms, he tirelessly drove himself to find the exact historical details for his battles during World War I. Andy read the journals of over 50 American men who had written journals while fighting in the trenches in Europe. Andy took new writing courses online and pursued writing five hours a day. And then, after four months, it came – a shock to all of us.

Mr. Andrew Spicer announced that one of his articles had been accepted by the American Heritage Foundation and he would no longer be a member of the group. He was now part of a historical writer’s group that met downtown on the same evening that we all met and he thought he would be better off with the historical society than with us.

In the ensuing weeks, we didn’t say much about Mr. Spicer, we were all too occupied with our own problems and getting our own work published. Then Mike brought in a copy of Mr. Spicer’s book, “Trench Warfare During WWI”. I was happy for Mr. Spicer, but didn’t say anything.

Betty said it, “Criticism, it all depends on how you take it.”


The opinions expressed by authors may not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com.
If you died today, are you absolutely certain that you would go to heaven? You can be right now. CLICK HERE

JOIN US at FaithWriters for Free. Grow as a Writer and Spread the Gospel.


This article has been read 266 times
Member Comments
Member Date
AnneRene' Capp 05/13/10
Thankful for the ending with Mr. Spicer getting published. Felt bad for you and him during the "unloving critiques", so would like to add that, critiques outside of a genuine heart to help, do cripple and thwart the "would be writer".
Mary Knoll Santos05/16/10
I loved this story very much. It was so engaging. Is Mr. Spicer a true person, I mean, in real life? I'd love ot meet him and learn from him. See? I was hooked! Thank you for sharing this story. Good writing. Well-done. Thank you.
Mildred Sheldon05/16/10
Thank you for an engaging story about critiques. I enjoyed this from beginning to end.
Dusti (Bramlage) Zarse05/21/10
If Andy isn't a real person, you sure did a wonderful job of making him seem real! Fascinating man. And, yes, critiques are helpful, but only if they come out of a geniune drive to help the writer become a better writer, and not out of a false sense of superiority. Too often we forget that. We try to make ourselves appear intelligent in our critiques at the expense of the writer. Well done.