Politics
BEGIN TIME Magazine Essay, November 14, 2005
What Was God Thinking? Science Can't Tell
By ERIC CORNELL
Scientists, this is a call to action. But also one to inaction. Why am I the messenger? Because my years of scientific research have made me a renowned expert on my topic: God. Just kidding. You'll soon see what I mean. Let me pose you a question, not about God but about the heavens: "Why is the sky blue?" I offer two answers: 1) The sky is blue because of the wavelength dependence of Rayleigh scattering; 2) The sky is blue because blue is the color God wants it to be.
My scientific research has been in areas connected to optical phenomena, and I can tell you a lot about the Rayleigh-scattering answer. Neither I nor any other scientist, however, has anything scientific to say about answer No. 2, the God answer. Not to say that the God answer is unscientific, just that the methods of science don't speak to that answer.
Before we understood Rayleigh scattering, there was no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the sky's blueness. The idea that the sky is blue because God wants it to be blue existed before scientists came to understand Rayleigh scattering, and it continues to exist today, not in the least undermined by our advance in scientific understanding. The religious explanation has been supplemented--but not supplanted--by advances in scientific knowledge. We now may, if we care to, think of Rayleigh scattering as the method God has chosen to implement his color scheme.
Right now there is a federal trial under way in Dover, Pa., over a school policy requiring teachers to tell students about "intelligent design" before teaching evolution. The central idea of intelligent design is that nature is the way it is because God wants it to be that way. This is not an assertion that can be tested in a scientific way, but studied in the right context, it is an interesting notion. As a theological idea, intelligent design is exciting. Listen: If nature is the way it is because God wants it to be that way, then, by looking at nature, one can learn what it is that God wants! The microscope and the telescope are no longer merely scientific instruments; they are windows into the mind of God.
But as exciting as intelligent design is in theology, it is a boring idea in science. Science isn't about knowing the mind of God; it's about understanding nature and the reasons for things. The thrill is that our ignorance exceeds our knowledge; the exciting part is what we don't understand yet. If you want to recruit the future generation of scientists, you don't draw a box around all our scientific understanding to date and say, "Everything outside this box we can explain only by invoking God's will." Back in 1855, no one told the future Lord Rayleigh that the scientific reason for the sky's blueness is that God wants it that way. Or if someone did tell him that, we can all be happy that the youth was plucky enough to ignore them. For science, intelligent design is a dead-end idea.
My call to action for scientists is, Work to ensure that the intelligent-design hypothesis is taught where it can contribute to the vitality of a field (as it could perhaps in theology class) and not taught in science class, where it would suck the excitement out of one of humankind's great ongoing adventures.
Now for my call to inaction: most scientists will concede that as powerful as science is, it can teach us nothing about values, ethics, morals or, for that matter, God. Don't go about pretending otherwise! For example, science can try to predict how human activity may change the climate, but science can't tell us whether those changes would be good or bad.
Should scientists, as humans, make judgments on ethics, morals, values and religion? Absolutely. Should we act on these judgments, in an effort to do good? You bet. Should we make use of the goodwill we may have accumulated through our scientific achievements to help us do good? Why not? Just don't claim that your science tells you "what is good" ... or "what is God."
Act: fight to keep intelligent design out of science classrooms! Don't act: don't say science disproves intelligent design. Stick with the plainest truth: science says nothing about intelligent design, and intelligent design brings nothing to science, and should be taught in theology, not science classes.
My value judgment is that further progress in science will be good for humanity. My argument here is offered in the spirit of trying to preserve science from its foes--but also from its friends.
END TIME Magazine Essay, November 14, 2005
Begin my letter to the Time editor:
Regarding Eric Cornell's November 14th, 2005 essay, "What Was God Thinking? Science Can't Tell"
I like Mr. Cornell. As any good scientist, he approaches issues from a purely logical standpoint. And, again, as an objective and open minded scientist, he allows the possibility that incomputable truths and measurable facts may both exist. Given a culture and world view that also tolerates such a possibility, his calls to action and inaction would be appropriate. I propose, however, that such a culture and world view still exists but is under heavy attack. What we are seeing in the Dover, PA trial is just one visible aspect of an invisible, spiritual war. Legal battles are just one of the many fronts for this war. The status of this war can only be viewed and measured by the prevailing values of the persons, communities, cultures, and governments that make our world.
"Intelligent design" represents a belief in the creator God. Federal cases against this belief are increasing exponentially. The Dover trial is one of many defensive battles to maintain the inclusion of that belief in our country. These battles are waged in the courts against the legal strategies of anti-believers. There is a sharp distinction between these fervent forces and the unbelievers, the undecided's, and the agnostics. I assume that Mr. Cornell is one of these in- between'ers. And his essay, unintentionally, supports anti-belief.
I ask Mr. Cornell, and other bystanders, to ask a few questions: If the invisible and immeasurable are of no import, why is the drive to remove all reflections of belief in them, in God, so strident? Why would so much energy be expended to remove the word/name ‘God’ from government related phrases and documents? Why would such dedication be applied to the banning of theology, in any Christian form at least, from all federally funded activities? The classes to which Mr. Cornell would relegate intelligent design will no longer exist if anti-believers have their way.
The term "godless communism", used to be cliché. Did that godlessness affect their success or failure in any way? We are well on our way to owning the labels "godless democracy", "godless republic", and "godless capitalists". Will such developments/declines affect our own national existence? If we do not measure our personal and national status by progressive/regressive states of morality, godfullness if you will, we will surely look back with remorse as so many godless regimes have in the past.
The spiritual energies that seek national and global dissipation of faith know how important belief is to the well being of us all. They know that God is, even if scientists do not see or deduce him from the unending calculations of Pi, the unending smallness viewable by our microscopes, and the unending largeness seen by our telescopes. They know that, and they do not want that knowledge to prevail. God will not serve them, but godless people and nations have no choice but to do so.
God is THE unmeasurable. The measurable is his gift for our fascination and exploration, as is our abilities to be fascinated and to explore.
PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR BELOW LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
Reader Count & Comments
Date
To be Honest, I skipped alot of the Time Article, and SOME of your article; because to the layman...science is somewhat over our heads; however, a shortened version would be that "the BIG BANG that scientists believe created planet Earth," would be akin to a publishing house having a big blast...and out of that Big Bang comes an unabridged dictionary. Think about it.
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com. This is especially true with articles that
deal with personal healthcare and prophecy. We encourage the reader to make their own decision in consultation with God, His Word, and others as needed.
This article has been read 1606 times < Previous | Next >
Read more articles by bob mueller or search for other articles by topic below.
This article has been read 1606 times < Previous | Next >
Search for articles on: (e.g. creation; holiness etc.)
Read more by clicking on a link:Free Reprints
Main Site Articles
Most Read Articles
Highly Acclaimed Challenge Articles.
New Release Christian Books for Free for a Simple Review.
NEW - Surprise Me With an Article - Click here for a random URL
God is Not Against You - He Came on an All Out Rescue Mission to Save You
...in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them... 2 Cor 5:19
Therefore, my friends, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. Acts 13:38
LEARN & TRUST JESUS HERE
FaithWriters offers Christian reading material for Christian readers. We offer Christian articles, Christian fiction, Christian non-fiction, Christian Bible studies, Christian poems, Christian articles for sale, free use Christian articles, Christian living articles, New Covenant Christian Bible Studies, Christian magazine articles and new Christian articles. We write for Jesus about God, the Bible, salvation, prayer and the word of God.