Hitler would give a A+ to the evolutionists for following his instructions. Hitler said. " a lie should be so colossal that no one would believe that someone could have the impudence(boldness) to distort the truth so infamously(scandalously.)"
Evolution certainly is a big lie and certainly something for which would even exceed Hitler's expectation. How could all those scientists be wrong? Would they lie? Are they specially gifted people and don't really need proof for their conclusions.
For the sake of this article we will use this definition of evolution. Speciation evolution was first used by biologist Orator F. Cook describing when a new species develops by a process called evolution describing an evolutionary process by which new biological species arise. It "leaps" from one lower life form into a higher life form.
Of course this supposedly corrects the bible in that God mentioned seven times that each species was created in its own kind. The evolutionists say this is a mistake. The great Jewish philosopher Moses Maimonides says, "Regarding all other prophets, God spoke to them through intermediaries. Regarding Moses, it was without one, as it says, “face to face I spoke to him”. He also said, "And this is that you believe that all of this Torah that was given by Moses our teacher, peace be upon him, that it is all from the mouth of God. Meaning that it was received by him entirely from God. And it is not known how Moses received it except by Moses himself, peace be upon him, that it came to him. That he was like a stenographer that you read to him and he writes all that is told to him." You can also read this in Numbers Chapter 12.
Sometimes the evolutionists make the mistake of telling the truth. You will find not only isn't evolution a fact it's not even a theory. A theory has to have some scientific empirical evidence. Evolution is a postulate. A postulate accepts something is true with no observable scientific evidence. Evolution is based on a postulate. The leading evolutionist of the day Richard Dawkins in his book "The Blind Watchmaker" said, " But in this chapter we are asking how improbable, how miraculous, a single event we are allowed to postulate. What is the largest single event of sheer naked coincidence, sheer miraculous unadulterated luck that we are allowed to get away with in our own theories, and still say we have a satisfactory explanation of life?" He can't believe we could be so naive.
He's not the only one to slip up and tell the truth. The infamous Pierre Tielhard participated in the Piltdown Man scandal as he was the one who filed down then teeth of the ape to make them look human. The bones and teeth were also chemically treated to give the appearance of being ancient." Tielhard said, ""Evolution is a general postulate to which all theories, all hypotheses, all systems must henceforward bow and which they must satisfy in order to be thinkable and true.
It is like speciation evolutionist Niles Eldridge admits, “Many trends, in other words, may exist more in the minds of the analysts than in phylogenetic history.” The definition of phylogenetic is relating to or based on evolutionary development.
It is clearly against the philosophy of these scientists to admit there is a God. Herman Biondi and Thomas Gold admitted not being able to philosophically accept the Big Bang Theory because it should there was god. Nobel winner Dr. George Wald admits "There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God." The vast majority of the scientific community knows there is no evolution but they can't admit there is a God.
The famous preacher Charles Spurgeon said it best. "You are not to be dogmatical in theology, my brethren, it is wicked; but for scientific men it is the correct thing. You are never to assert anything very strongly; but scientists may boldly assert what they cannot prove."
Here is a statement from Hugh Owen at the Kolbe Center (Catholic) for the Study of Creation. "In the final analysis, the primary purpose of our apostolate is the salvation and sanctification of souls, and the protection of souls from evolutionary errors that weaken and often extinguish the Faith. On my recent trip to Estonia on the western border of Russia, one of my hosts told me of a young Catholic boy at a local school who had just announced to his mother that he was not going to go to church any longer—he had studied enough evolutionary “science” to know that the Christian account of creation and the Fall was a “fairy tale”! How sad it is that all over the world, millions of young people renounce the “sacred history” of Genesis.
Here's a quote you probably never saw. Why if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transition forms? Why is nature not all in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them well defined? This quote is from Charles Darwin himsellf.
Fr. George Coyne stated , "Intelligent design isn't science even though it pretends to be. If you want to teach it in schools, intelligent design should be taught when religion or cultural history is taught not science." I agree that it should be taught as history. The problem is evolution should not be taught as a fact or theory. It should be taught as a fairytale.