With an imposter in the White House, caused by not allowing the “Electors” to do their Constitutional duties as to investigate and see if any person is fit and qualify to hold that guarded office, and all his records are legally sealed so that no one can view them, the Birthers are losing their battles in court as they fight to disclose that the imposter, Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States and cannot be President of the United States per the US Constitution.
The Birthers and alike are presenting their case against Obama incorrectly before our Court System. They could be dismissed because of one possible reason, that the courts know the truth and wish not to address that issue. However, this might be the Birthers argument as to why the courts reject their cases but the real reason why the Birthers are losing in the court system is because, as Judge Surrick stated in the 2009 decision, for “lack of standing.”
In the earliest case that I can remember, Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340 (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of PA) by Philip J. Berg, an attorney, and like Berg and the other Birthers, they are having their cases dismissed because of “lack of standing.” Berg’s statement after the ruling was, “If we (the people) don’t have standing, then who does?” This shows the lack of understanding of voters about our Election System towards choosing a person for the office of President. We are led to believe that the people elect the President.
The reason why the court refuses to hear his case and like cases is because, like the U.S. District court ruling, he and others do not have “STANDING.” This word “standing” means he and others do not have the legal right to bring up such cases because they have no part in it. The legal definition of standing is “the right to file a lawsuit or file a petition under the circumstances.”
And the Courts are stating a true fact that American voters have no legal say as to how or who will be the President of the United States or if that person is qualified or not. That is constitutionally left up to the Electors.
So in order to fight this case in any court, one must get an elector from the 2008 election—one who was not bound by State law as whom they can vote for and one from a State that the electors were bound by State law on who to vote for.
The Electors are the only ones that have “standing” in any court proceeding dealing with the election of the President of the United States. Case closed.