Paradigm on the debate between Evolution and Creation
by Richlon Merrill
Free to Share
Author requests article critique
Free to Share
Author requests article critique
SEND A PRIVATE MESSAGE
HIRE THIS WRITER
Allow me to first lay a foundation. Depending upon whose material you read, you are going to be faced with a myriad of “facts” concerning the evolution/creation debate. As you peruse the “facts”, you are faced with a decision of determining who is right and who is wrong? The usual approach is to input information and then decide the truth of the matter. But the decision must be based upon another greater question altogether; upon what authority are you basing your opinions? To the one who professes belief in God, then God must become the ultimate authority. To an unbeliever, the authority lies solely on that 4 pound mass of tissue between his or her ears. One might argue that in either case, we are all left to our own judgments concerning the existence of God and therefore have become our own authority. And to some degree I would agree. But the premise of Scripture is that we are all born with a flawed nature making it virtually impossible to reason effectively. In other words, we are like a corrupt computer hard drive which can only output distorted data. Our emotions, thoughts, affections, and desires all flow out of a distorted soul which is incapable of making altogether accurate conclusions. Regardless of where you stand in your theology, a quick look around the world makes it evident that people are pretty messed up. One man’s right is another man’s wrong. One man’s truth is another man’s error. What hope, therefore, is there for discovering any truth about anything? In the words of Jesus Christ, “what is impossible with man is possible with God.” (Matthew 19:26). God must be the One who reveals Himself to us and regenerates our soul. The evidence of his supreme power and intelligence surrounds us both day and night, but the one who ignores that revelation will never come to know God or His truth. That person will ignore the greater revelation of God found in the Bible. Our job is to humbly submit to God’s revelation and work in our life. In so doing, we are allowing God to be the authority, and not man.
Now back to the evolution debate. For those who are swayed towards evolution being the explanation for life on earth, they must begin with the notion that God either does not exist or that God’s revelation of Himself through Scripture is inaccurate or wrong. If, in fact, there is no God, then who can argue against evolution? It would, in fact, be the ONLY explanation for life on earth. In which case, a person relying on himself or herself as the ultimate authority will probably not be swayed by the volumes of scientific evidence and discovery supplied by Creation Science. But for one who leans towards the authority of God and His revelation of Himself and his truth to us through Scripture, read on.
This purpose of this treatise is not to provide all the scientific evidence which disputes the evolutionary model, but rather to point out the inconsistencies of evolutionary theory with regards to Scripture.
The first few chapters of Genesis provide us a brief overview of creation. The very first words of the Bible read, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” Scriptural revelation, therefore, does not begin by trying to prove anything. It simply states a claim that God is the Creator of everything. You either believe it or you don’t. The account then goes on to provide more revelation concerning God’s act of creation. If we choose to dispute this account or try and explain it away in order to fit the evolutionary model, then we have already begun to drift away from Scriptural revelation and authority. At this point, we must disregard other scriptural authority as no authority at all. We try and make God fit into our way of thinking which takes us down a path of continued disregard for the words found in Scripture. This puts us right back where we began. We continue to be our own authority.
For instance, through the account of creation, we discover that God made the first two people. They were created in His image. We are then given an explanation for sin. Adam and Eve fell. At that point the Bible goes on to reveal the consequences of that fall and God’s plan to right the wrong. If mankind came as a result of evolving from more primitive life forms, then at what point did God finally provide man with a soul, create him in his own likeness, and place him in a faultless world, uncorrupted by sin? And if evolution is based upon millions of years of death and destruction taking place on the planet, then why does the Bible proclaim that death came as a result of the fall of man?
In the first chapter of Genesis we are told over and over again that each living organism was made “after its kind”, meaning that each species was created differently from every other species. Scientists have discovered similarities in the DNA structure within a common species, but vast differences between the DNA of differing species. If God created everything in this way, how do we then also allow for the process of evolution? We trust either in the process of evolution and thus deny scripture, or we believe what scripture says.
Every biological scientist would agree that every life form is dependent upon every other life form. No life form can exist on its own apart from every other life form. A symbiotic relationship exists which keeps all of life in balance. It has been this way from the very beginning of creation… if you hold to a creation view. The evolutionary process does not account for this balance of life. Millions of years pass between one life form and another.
How do we argue against the evidence which supports an old earth? New discoveries are putting new light on these views. Carbon dating, radioactive decay, chemical analysis of rocks and other such tools are being shown to be unreliable. They begin with assumptions and then try and make analysis line up with these assumptions. Employing different diagnostic tools to the same specimens have resulted in vastly different findings. And again, if certain assumptions end up being wrong, then the data will be wrong.
For instance, if one takes into account a world-wide catastrophic flood as described in Genesis, then that can make an enormous impact on findings on the age of rocks. Evolutionists disregard the flood account because they do not believe in the accuracy of Scripture. The flood account was, in fact, incredibly catastrophic. According to Scripture, the planet and atmosphere before the flood were entirely different from the conditions we now know. The Bible describes the “fountains of the deep” opening up and devastating the entire surface of the world. An honest appraisal of the earth’s surface agrees with this finding. And yet, the “old earth” advocates will not allow such factors to be considered when analyzing data. There are many other factors which should be, but are not, being included in the mainstream science of evolution and the age of the earth.
Once again, this treatise is not intended to provide the volumes of evidence which reveal the flaws in the evolutionary model. The point is to suggest that one’s basis of authority is the determining factor in making a judgment on the debate between evolution and creation.
Why is evolution so widely accepted? The fact remains that many in the academic and scientific community censor any evidence that suggests God was involved in creation and life in the universe even when that evidence is backed by scientific discovery. Evolution is a religion… it is a world view, and not science. It assumes no God and therefore is the only viable explanation. Sadly, those in the academic world are not interested in bringing truth to the table if it does not fit into their world view. When all avenues of discovery are allowed to have a voice, only creation science proves to provide the better explanation for life on earth.
We read these words from 2 Timothy 3:16, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness…” Psalm 119 and other passages of Scripture echo the point that all of the words found in Scripture are authoritative. Jesus himself made this claim. Since Scripture is our ultimate authority, then we must throw out the concept of evolution because it is diametrically opposed to the truths found in Scripture.
Yes, continue to search for the truth and study the findings of science. You will discover time and time again that the truths found in Scripture are confirmed by new scientific discoveries. Or perhaps it would be better to say that Scripture turns out to be the greater authority. While Scripture is never intended to be a scientific textbook, it is intended to be our authority in life and the means by which we discover God’s ultimate truth and His path for our life.
PLEASE ENCOURAGE AUTHOR, LEAVE COMMENT ON ARTICLE
Read more articles by Richlon Merrill or search for other articles by topic below.
Search for articles on: (e.g. creation; holiness etc.)Read more by clicking on a link:
Main Site Articles
Most Read Articles
Highly Acclaimed Challenge Articles.
New Release Christian Books for Free for a Simple Review.
God is Not Against You - He Came on an All Out Rescue Mission to Save You
...in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them... 2 Cor 5:19
Therefore, my friends, I want you to know that through Jesus the forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you. Acts 13:38
LEARN & TRUST JESUS HERE
The opinions expressed by authors do not necessarily reflect the opinion of FaithWriters.com.
This article has been read 320 times < Previous | Next >